A quality circle (QC) thrives on employees participating voluntarily or by invitation: It is best to start with a clear purpose (e.g., process improvement in the team), a fixed group of participants, regular meetings, and simple rules (confidentiality, solution-oriented, data-based). It also makes sense to have a clear distribution of roles, such as moderator (guides the agenda and methods), minute-taker (records decisions/to-dos), topic owner (provides context and data), and, if necessary, sponsor from management (removes obstacles). The tasks can be rotated so that everyone takes on responsibility.
Success can then be measured using a few tangible KPIs: these could include the implementation rate of the measures, the lead time to implementation, measurable process indicators (error rate, waiting times, rework effort), the degree of participation, and team satisfaction. In terms of content, recurring problems, interface and process issues, or quality deviations within the team's sphere of influence are particularly well suited for a quality circle; topics without decision-making leeway, purely theoretical debates, or individual performance evaluations are less suitable. Common mistakes in this context include unclear goals, missing data, overly large groups, "meetings without implementation," blame instead of root cause analysis, and lack of support during implementation (resources/decisions).